Group: FSF Community Team

From LibrePlanet
Jump to: navigation, search
(Response Templates: replace categories with properties)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Community Team}}
 
{{Community Team}}
 +
  
 
= About =
 
= About =
Line 16: Line 17:
 
* Maintaining the [[/List of sites to monitor|list of sites to monitor]].
 
* Maintaining the [[/List of sites to monitor|list of sites to monitor]].
 
* Responding to articles and blog posts in a timely and effective fashion.
 
* Responding to articles and blog posts in a timely and effective fashion.
 +
** Here is our list of some current news-worthy targets: {{#ask:[[Property:News-target]]|format=list}}
 
* Answering questions and correcting misconceptions about free software.
 
* Answering questions and correcting misconceptions about free software.
 
* Making sure that important stories get as much attention as possible.
 
* Making sure that important stories get as much attention as possible.

Revision as of 15:43, 18 May 2011

LibrePlanet Rapid Responders

Main page
Participants
Workflow
Sites to watch
Example answers
Discussion list


About

The FSF Community Team aims to spread the free software philosophy in blogs, online press, and through social networking sites.

What we do

The activities of this team break down into two main functions:

  1. Responding to media and press concerning free software
  2. Spreading links that effectively and accurately promote free software

We do the above in an organized fashion which involves all of the following:

  • Maintaining the list of sites to monitor.
  • Responding to articles and blog posts in a timely and effective fashion.
    • Here is our list of some current news-worthy targets: News-target
  • Answering questions and correcting misconceptions about free software.
  • Making sure that important stories get as much attention as possible.

Get Involved

Involvement can be anything from just following the email list to share the links or throw support behind important articles all the way to writing full articles about free software.

Join Us!

If this is something that interests you, please join the discussion list:

Thanks, and we appreciate your support!

If you spend time reading popular blogs or mainstream press and you have a good handle on the debate around software freedom, your help would be very valuable!

Just to be clear, the goal here is not to get into long, drawn out flame-wars that have been repeated elsewhere :) Rather, this will be an organized and careful approach to shifting the debate about the public's control of technology.

Getting Started

Since you'll often be writing on behalf of the FSF, the second step is for you to do some simple reading and writing to show staff and other volunteers on this list that you're well-prepared for the role. So, what we need you to do is pretty simple.

  1. Send us a quick introduction. What blogs, news sites, or communities do you follow? What--if any--areas would you like to focus on?
  2. Reply to the list, letting us know when you've read these three articles about FSF's basic philosophy and political approach, along with any questions you have (questions are good!):
  1. Write some short responses to these excerpts below, as if you were responding with a short comment to somebody's blog post on FSF's behalf. These are representative of the sort of things we often find ourselves responding to. Be polite, concise, and--most of all--make sure you hit the most important points.

This will give us an idea of your writing style, and it gives FSF staff and other volunteers on the list a chance to offer feedback and show you the ropes.

  • "Linux is awesome for checking email and browsing the web."
  • "But make no mistake, if the real version 2 of the European Interoperability Framework is anything like the one discussed above, with its pathetically devalued definition of openness, and its espousal of the risible “openness continuum”, it will represent a huge setback for the use of free software in Europe, and a major boost for closed-source software producers and the patents they all-too often claim there - even though software cannot be patented “as such” in Europe." Link
  • "When combined with the other chapters that include statutory damages, search and seizure powers for border guards, anti-camcording rules, and mandatory disclosure of personal information requirements, it is clear that there is no bigger intellectual property issue today than the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement being negotiated behind closed doors this week in Korea." Link

FAQ

Response Templates


"issue" is not in the list (interest, location, project, school) of allowed values for the "Organized around" property.