Template: ERC Checklist

From LibrePlanet
Jump to: navigation, search
(initial checklist)
 
(elaborate 'ERC')
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>
This is the ERC evaluation checklist for {{ #ifeq: {{SUBPAGENAME}} | ERC Checklist | <HOST_NAME> | {{SUBPAGENAME}} }} as compiled by the [[Repository_Ethics | Community Workgroup for Libre Forge Software and Ethical Repository Hosts]]. <!-- TODO: establish a formal group page, such as Group:FreedSoftware -->
+
This is the GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations (ERC) evaluation checklist for {{ #ifeq: {{SUBPAGENAME}} | ERC Checklist | <HOST_NAME> | {{SUBPAGENAME}} }} as compiled by the [[Repository_Ethics | Community Workgroup for Libre Forge Software and Ethical Repository Hosts]]. <!-- TODO: establish a formal group page, such as Group:FreedSoftware -->
 
The text of each criteria in the checklist table is a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC.
 
The text of each criteria in the checklist table is a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC.
 
Please send any questions or comments to the [https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/repo-criteria-discuss repo-criteria-discuss mailing list].
 
Please send any questions or comments to the [https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/repo-criteria-discuss repo-criteria-discuss mailing list].

Revision as of 07:40, 20 March 2021

This is the standard GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations (ERC) checklist template for repository evaluations. It should instantiated at the beginning of the community evaluation phase, for each interesting repository host.

To use this template:

  • Create a new wiki page, reflecting the name of the host.
  • Add the framed text below as the body of the new page.
  • Each line beginning with a pipe '|' symbol, corresponds to one of the checklist criteria.
  • The 'TODO' place-holder following the equals symbol '=' on each such line, may be replaced with arbitrary notes.
  • There must be some text following the equals symbol '=' on each such line, until that criteria passes.
  • Any text following an equals symbol '=' on any such line, indicates a pending (or failing) state for that criteria (☐ will be shown).
  • As each criteria passes review, delete the entire corresponding line (☑ will be shown).
  • The text of each criteria in the rendered checklist table, will be a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC.
  • The 'TODO' place-holder or the replacement notes, will be shown beneath each criteria in the rendered checklist table.
{{ERC_Checklist
|C0=TODO
|C0-0=TODO
|C0-1=TODO
|C1=TODO
|C2=TODO
|C3=TODO
|C4=TODO
|C5=TODO
|C6=TODO
|B0=TODO
|B1=TODO
|B2=TODO
|B3=TODO
|A0=TODO
|A1=TODO
|A2=TODO
|A3=TODO
|A4=TODO
|A5=TODO
|A6=TODO
|A7=TODO
|A8=TODO
|A9=TODO
|A-plus-0=TODO
|A-plus-1=TODO
|A-plus-2=TODO
|A-plus-3=TODO
|A-plus-4=TODO
|A-plus-5=TODO
}}

The rendered checklist page will resemble the table below, with boxes beside each pending criteria, and check-marks beside each passing criteria.

Sample Checklist:

This is the GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations (ERC) evaluation checklist for <HOST_NAME> as compiled by the Community Workgroup for Libre Forge Software and Ethical Repository Hosts. The text of each criteria in the checklist table is a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC. Please send any questions or comments to the repo-criteria-discuss mailing list.

ERC Checklist for <HOST_NAME>
C0 - Freely licensed JS for essential features
C0-0 - Either: 'B0' with CCS for client-code scripts, or 'A0'
C0-1 - Libre interpreters, "trans-pilers", and input sources
C1 - No non-free client requirements
C2 - No discrimination
C3 - Tor access
C4 - Non-odious TOS
C5 - Recommends GPLv3-or-later
C6 - HTTPS access
B0 - Compatible with LibreJS (or equivalent tool)
B1 - No tracking
B2 - Does not encourage unclear licensing
B3 - Does not recommend non-free licenses
A0 - Fully-functional without client-side scripts
A1 - Freely-licensed server-side code
A2 - Prefers GPLv3-or-later projects
A3 - Offers AGPLv3-or-later
A4 - Does not permit non-free licenses
A5 - Does not recommend SaaSS
A6 - Does not mention “Open Source”
A7 - Clearly endorses software freedom
A8 - Refers to GNU/Linux, wherever applicable
A+0 - Registration not required
A+2 - No logging
A+2 - Follows EFF guidelines
A+3 - Conforms to WCAG standard
A+4 - Conforms to WAI-ARIA standard
A+5 - Complete data exportability