ERC/Savannah

This is the GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations (ERC) evaluation checklist for Savannah, as compiled by the Community Workgroup for Libre Forge Software and Ethical Repository Hosts. The text of each criteria in the checklist table is a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC. Please send any questions or comments to the repo-criteria-discuss mailing list.

ERC Checklist for Savannah
☑	C0 - Freely licensed JS for essential features
☑	C0-0 - Either: 'B0' with CCS for client-code scripts, or 'A0'
☑	C0-1 - Libre interpreters, "trans-pilers", and input sources
☑	C1 - No non-free client requirements
☑	C2 - No discrimination
☑	C3 - Tor access
☑	C4 - Non-odious TOS
☑	C5 - Recommends GPLv3-or-later
☑	C6 - HTTPS access
☑	B0 - Compatible with LibreJS (or equivalent tool)
☑	B1 - No tracking
☑	B2 - Does not encourage unclear licensing
☐	B2-0 - Explains each of the licensing options NOTES: could not find wording to satisfy this
☑	B2-1 - Explains the importance of license notices
☑	B3 - Does not recommend non-free licenses
☑	A0 - Fully-functional without client-side scripts
☑	A1 - Freely-licensed server-side code
☑	A2 - Prefers GPLv3-or-later projects
☑	A3 - Offers AGPLv3-or-later
☑	A4 - Does not permit non-free licenses
☑	A5 - Does not recommend SaaSS
☑	A6 - Does not mention “Open Source”
☑	A7 - Clearly endorses software freedom
☑	A8 - Refers to GNU/Linux, wherever applicable
☑	A9 - Requires thorough and clear licensing
☑	A-plus 0 - Registration not required
☐	A-plus 1 - No logging NOTES: There are normal Web access/download logs which sometimes include IP addresses.
☐	A-plus 2 - Follows EFF guidelines NOTES: It follows EFF's criteria only partially; complying with the rest remains in progress.
☐	A-plus 3 - Conforms to WCAG standard NOTES: HTML_CodeSniffer reports dozen of errors and warnings related to WCAG 2.0 compliance on every page.
☐	A-plus 4 - Conforms to WAI-ARIA standard NOTES: There is no WAI-ARIA markup in its pages.
☐	A-plus 5 - Complete data exportability NOTES: There is no way of exporting data contributed by project owners or contributors.
☐	A-plus 6 - Prefers AGPLv3-or-later projects NOTES: TODO
☐	A-plus 7 - Helps or reminds users to put license notices NOTES: No, A+7 is something of an ideal. It would take a lot of work.