Introduction
For some people, the infrastructure of FSDG compliant distributions is something important for choosing a distribution.
It's also useful to know about it to see how fragile the distribution is.
Distributions
Guix
| Hosting
|
Hosting details
|
Service
|
Software
|
Comments
|
| GNU
|
|
Git repositories
|
|
|
| Mailing lists
|
Mailman
|
|
| GNU?
|
Probably a small VM at the FSF[1]
|
Builder and packages hosting: ci.guix.gnu.org
|
|
|
| MDC at INRIA (French academic research institution)?
|
* Machine with a nonfree boot software[2]
|
Builder and packages hosting: bordeaux.guix.gnu.org
|
|
|
Parabola
| Service
|
Software
|
Hosting
|
Comments
|
| Bug tracker
|
Redmine
|
Self hosted in a VM, probably in some machine with a nonfree boot software not controlled by Parabola.
|
| git
|
?
|
|
| Mailing lists
|
Mailman
|
|
Replicant
| Hosting
|
Hosting details
|
Service
|
Software
|
Comments
|
| FSF VM
|
|
Contact mail address
|
|
| git
|
|
|
| IRC Bridge
|
|
| OSUOSL
|
managed by OSUOSL
|
Bug tracker
|
|
|
| FTP
|
- A web server (Apache? Nginx?)
- OpenSSH with sftp enabled
- A script inside the server to make new changes public
|
|
| Mailing list
|
- Mailman
- Probably some SMTP server software
|
|
References
-
↑ If it's the same machine than the previous hydra.gnu.org, the Ten years of failures talk at Ten Years of Guix says that hydra.gnu.org is a "Virtual machine hosted at the FSF" and that it is "Too weak for our growing needs".
-
↑ See the Ten years of failures talk at Ten Years of Guix for more details.
-
↑ This allows to create secret repositories if necessary, for instance to work on criteria for choosing a community manager, to work on mails for reviewing applications for that, etc.