Group: Free Javascript Action Team/Free JavaScript FAQ
From LibrePlanet
(Created page with "''Note: this is a draft and does not necessarily represent the opinions of anyone.'' ===Question 1=== Amazingly communicative and well-informed answer. ===What exactly does the...") |
(→What exactly does the campaign ask Web sites to do?) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''Note: this is a draft and does not necessarily represent the opinions of anyone.'' | + | '''''Note: this is a draft and does not necessarily represent the opinions of anyone.''''' |
===Question 1=== | ===Question 1=== | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===What exactly does the campaign ask Web sites to do?=== | ===What exactly does the campaign ask Web sites to do?=== | ||
| − | Two steps: first, have all essential features work without nonfree JS. Then, if possible, move on to make the site work completely without requiring any nonfree software on the user's machine, or sugggesting that they use it. Plz write this out a little more clearly | + | Two steps: first, have all essential features work without nonfree JS. We call this LibreJS-compatible. Then, if possible, move on to make the site work completely without requiring any nonfree software on the user's machine, or sugggesting that they use it. We call this free software-friendly. ''Plz write this out a little more clearly.'' |
| + | |||
| + | ===Question 3=== | ||
| + | Another awesome answer. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:31, 14 August 2014
Note: this is a draft and does not necessarily represent the opinions of anyone.
Question 1
Amazingly communicative and well-informed answer.
What exactly does the campaign ask Web sites to do?
Two steps: first, have all essential features work without nonfree JS. We call this LibreJS-compatible. Then, if possible, move on to make the site work completely without requiring any nonfree software on the user's machine, or sugggesting that they use it. We call this free software-friendly. Plz write this out a little more clearly.
Question 3
Another awesome answer.
