Difference between revisions of "GNU Hackers' Meeting"
m (apostrophe) |
m (removed para not relevant to main topic of talk) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
These meetings were held in Europe to get developers to know one another. | These meetings were held in Europe to get developers to know one another. | ||
| − | These meetings were recorded at www. | + | These meetings were recorded at [http://river-valley.tv/conferences/gnu_hackers_2008/ www.river-valley.tv]. |
The meetings were held to overcome inadequacy of email as a primary form of communication among GNU developers. | The meetings were held to overcome inadequacy of email as a primary form of communication among GNU developers. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Though programs may be old, they still must be maintained, so volunteerism among developers is still important. Among important ongoing tasks are those of portability. | Though programs may be old, they still must be maintained, so volunteerism among developers is still important. Among important ongoing tasks are those of portability. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Motivation for the developers' meeting: | Motivation for the developers' meeting: | ||
| Line 22: | Line 20: | ||
To support development of GNU software. The field of "Computer Supportive Cooperative Work" contains prior studies on how computers can be used to facilitate collaboration. | To support development of GNU software. The field of "Computer Supportive Cooperative Work" contains prior studies on how computers can be used to facilitate collaboration. | ||
| − | A matrix is used to categorize work: | + | A place/time matrix is used to categorize work: |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | {| | |
| + | ! !! synchronous !! asynchronous | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! local | ||
| + | | face-to-face || | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! remote | ||
| + | | irc || email,web | ||
| + | |} | ||
| − | Most developers of free software spend their time in the asynchronous/remote category | + | Most developers of free software spend their time in the asynchronous/remote category commuicating through email and blogs (this is called "computer mediated communication" in the literature). |
Computer-mediated communication has obvious positive effects: It's cheap and many developers can participate from different areas. This style of communication is best for partitionable tasks. Until now, most GNU software development has been partitionable. | Computer-mediated communication has obvious positive effects: It's cheap and many developers can participate from different areas. This style of communication is best for partitionable tasks. Until now, most GNU software development has been partitionable. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:53, 21 September 2009
Speaker's slides Media:GHMTalk.pdf
These meetings were held in Europe to get developers to know one another. These meetings were recorded at www.river-valley.tv.
The meetings were held to overcome inadequacy of email as a primary form of communication among GNU developers.
Among other motivations for the meetings were:
Motivating volunteers to contribute to older programs can be difficult.
What is the role of the GNU project developers after the software has matured?
How should priorities for development be set?
Though programs may be old, they still must be maintained, so volunteerism among developers is still important. Among important ongoing tasks are those of portability.
Motivation for the developers' meeting:
To support development of GNU software. The field of "Computer Supportive Cooperative Work" contains prior studies on how computers can be used to facilitate collaboration.
A place/time matrix is used to categorize work:
| synchronous | asynchronous | |
|---|---|---|
| local | face-to-face | |
| remote | irc | email,web |
Most developers of free software spend their time in the asynchronous/remote category commuicating through email and blogs (this is called "computer mediated communication" in the literature).
Computer-mediated communication has obvious positive effects: It's cheap and many developers can participate from different areas. This style of communication is best for partitionable tasks. Until now, most GNU software development has been partitionable.
But as the GNU system grows, many tasks arise that are not partitionable.
Some of the negative effects recorded in the literature are:
1. Communication is less robust: Misunderstandings flourish, and many developers are unaware of each others' efforts.
2. Establishing common ground is difficult. Studies show humans tend to reach agreement more easily face-to-face.
3. "Increased interpersonal conflicts" (flame wars): flaming can destroy motivation to contribute.
Being productive in the future requires avoiding these effects. The GNU Hackers' meetings are one attempt to do so, though having such in-person meetings is difficult over distances. There should be other technological solutions to the problem.
There will be another GNU Hackers' meeting in Sweden in November 2009.
