Difference between revisions of "ERC/Notabug"
From LibrePlanet
Bill-auger (talk | contribs) (convert to ERC checklist) |
Bill-auger (talk | contribs) m (Bill-auger moved page Notabug to ERC/Notabug: group with the others) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ERC_Checklist | {{ERC_Checklist | ||
| − | |C0= | + | |C0= |
| − | |C0-0= | + | |C0-0= |
| − | |C0-1= | + | |C0-1= |
| − | |C1= | + | |C1= |
| − | |C2= | + | |C2= |
| − | |C3= | + | |C3= |
| − | |C4= | + | |C4= |
| − | |C5= | + | |C5= |
| − | |C6= | + | |C6= |
| − | |B0= | + | |B0=one script was rejected - it is perhaps a missing or outdated web-label |
| − | |B1= | + | https://notabug.org/assets/librejs/librejs.html |
| − | |B2= | + | |B1= |
| − | |B3= | + | |B2= |
| − | |A0= | + | |B2-0=no licensing documentation |
| − | |A1= | + | |B2-1=no licensing documentation |
| − | |A2= | + | |B3= |
| − | |A3= | + | |A0= |
| − | |A4= | + | |A1= |
| − | |A5= | + | |A2=pending clarification of this criteria |
| − | |A6= | + | * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00006.html |
| − | |A7= | + | |A3=pending clarification of this criteria |
| − | |A8= | + | * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00013.html |
| − | |A9= | + | * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00018.html |
| + | |A4= | ||
| + | |A5= | ||
| + | |A6= | ||
| + | |A7= | ||
| + | |A8= | ||
| + | |A9=no such requirement | ||
|A-plus-0=TODO | |A-plus-0=TODO | ||
|A-plus-1=TODO | |A-plus-1=TODO | ||
| Line 28: | Line 34: | ||
|A-plus-3=TODO | |A-plus-3=TODO | ||
|A-plus-4=TODO | |A-plus-4=TODO | ||
| − | |A-plus-5= | + | |A-plus-5=FAIL - no API or export functionality - although, users may request a raw DB dump, at the admin's discretion; i don't believe that satisfies this criteria |
| + | |A-plus-6=no licensing documentation | ||
| + | |A-plus-7=No, A+7 is something of an ideal. It would take a lot of work for any forge. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Evaluations: | ||
| + | * 2016-04 - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2016-04/msg00077.html | ||
| + | * 2021-03 - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00052.html | ||
Latest revision as of 22:06, 16 April 2024
This is the GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations (ERC) evaluation checklist for Notabug, as compiled by the Community Workgroup for Libre Forge Software and Ethical Repository Hosts. The text of each criteria in the checklist table is a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC. Please send any questions or comments to the repo-criteria-discuss mailing list.
Evaluations:
