Difference between revisions of "ERC/Notabug"
Bill-auger (talk | contribs) (convert to ERC checklist) |
Bill-auger (talk | contribs) (initial data) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ERC_Checklist | {{ERC_Checklist | ||
− | |C0= | + | |C0= |
− | |C0-0= | + | |C0-0= |
− | |C0-1= | + | |C0-1= |
− | |C1= | + | |C1= |
− | |C2= | + | |C2= |
− | |C3= | + | |C3= |
− | |C4= | + | |C4= |
− | |C5= | + | |C5= |
− | |C6= | + | |C6= |
− | |B0= | + | |B0=one script was rejected - it is perhaps a missing or outdated web-label |
− | |B1= | + | https://notabug.org/assets/librejs/librejs.html |
− | |B2= | + | |B1= |
− | |B3= | + | |B2= |
− | |A0= | + | |B3= |
− | |A1= | + | |A0= |
− | |A2= | + | |A1= |
− | |A3= | + | |A2=pending clarification of this criteria |
− | |A4= | + | * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00006.html |
− | |A5= | + | |A3=pending clarification of this criteria |
− | |A6= | + | * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00013.html |
− | |A7= | + | * https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-04/msg00018.html |
− | |A8= | + | |A4= |
− | |A9= | + | |A5= |
+ | |A6= | ||
+ | |A7= | ||
+ | |A8= | ||
+ | |A9= | ||
|A-plus-0=TODO | |A-plus-0=TODO | ||
|A-plus-1=TODO | |A-plus-1=TODO | ||
Line 28: | Line 32: | ||
|A-plus-3=TODO | |A-plus-3=TODO | ||
|A-plus-4=TODO | |A-plus-4=TODO | ||
− | |A-plus-5= | + | |A-plus-5=FAIL - no API or export functionality - although, users may request a raw DB dump, at the admin's discretion; i don't believe that satisfies this criteria |
}} | }} |
Revision as of 05:36, 6 April 2021
This is the GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations (ERC) evaluation checklist for Notabug, as compiled by the Community Workgroup for Libre Forge Software and Ethical Repository Hosts. The text of each criteria in the checklist table is a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC. Please send any questions or comments to the repo-criteria-discuss mailing list.