Difference between revisions of "ERC/Codeberg"
(Copying answers from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00005.html) |
(Adapting comments from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00007.html) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|A6=No, as they use the neutral term "Free and Open Source Software" and "Open Source", like in their Mission Statement: https://blog.codeberg.org/codebergorg-launched.html | |A6=No, as they use the neutral term "Free and Open Source Software" and "Open Source", like in their Mission Statement: https://blog.codeberg.org/codebergorg-launched.html | ||
|A7=No, as it's a mix. In their mission statement they say "Open Source" and "Free and Open Source Software": https://blog.codeberg.org/codebergorg-launched.html. On the other hand, their "What is Codeberg?" page unilaterally says "Free Software": https://docs.codeberg.page/getting-started/what-is-codeberg/ | |A7=No, as it's a mix. In their mission statement they say "Open Source" and "Free and Open Source Software": https://blog.codeberg.org/codebergorg-launched.html. On the other hand, their "What is Codeberg?" page unilaterally says "Free Software": https://docs.codeberg.page/getting-started/what-is-codeberg/ | ||
− | |A8= | + | |A8= |
|A9=No. | |A9=No. | ||
|A-plus-0= | |A-plus-0= |
Revision as of 07:09, 8 June 2021
This is the GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations (ERC) evaluation checklist for Codeberg, as compiled by the Community Workgroup for Libre Forge Software and Ethical Repository Hosts. The text of each criteria in the checklist table is a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC. Please send any questions or comments to the repo-criteria-discuss mailing list.