Difference between revisions of "ERC/Sourcehut"
From LibrePlanet
Bill-auger (talk | contribs) (initial checklist) |
Bill-auger (talk | contribs) (initial evaluation) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ERC_Checklist | {{ERC_Checklist | ||
| − | |C0= | + | |C0= |
| − | |C0-0= | + | |C0-0= |
| − | |C0-1= | + | |C0-1= |
| − | |C1= | + | |C1= |
| − | |C2= | + | |C2= |
| − | |C3= | + | |C3= |
| − | |C4= | + | |C4= |
| − | |C5= | + | |C5= |
| − | |C6= | + | |C6= |
| − | |B0= | + | |B0= |
| − | |B1= | + | |B1= |
| − | |B2= | + | |B2= |
| − | |B3= | + | |B3= |
| − | |A0= | + | |A0= |
| − | |A1= | + | |A1= |
| − | |A2= | + | |A2= |
| − | |A3= | + | |A3= |
| − | |A4= | + | |A4=Allows non-free licenses and no license |
| − | |A5= | + | |A5= |
| − | |A6= | + | |A6="100% free and open source software" |
| − | |A7= | + | https://sourcehut.org/ |
| − | |A8= | + | |A7="100% free and open source software" |
| − | |A9= | + | https://sourcehut.org/ |
| − | |A-plus-0= | + | |A8="Runs fully virtualised builds on various Linux distros and BSDs" |
| − | |A-plus-1= | + | https://sourcehut.org/ |
| − | |A-plus-2= | + | |A9=no such requirement |
| − | |A-plus-3= | + | |A-plus-0= |
| − | |A-plus-4= | + | |A-plus-1=logs are kept for 30 days; and users may access their pertinent logs |
| − | |A-plus-5= | + | |A-plus-2=implementation is in progress |
| + | |A-plus-3= | ||
| + | |A-plus-4= | ||
| + | |A-plus-5=implementation is in progress | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Evaluations: | ||
| + | * 2020-01 - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2020-01/msg00011.html | ||
| + | * 2021-03 - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00004.html | ||
Revision as of 06:45, 6 April 2021
This is the GNU Ethical Repository Criteria Evaluations (ERC) evaluation checklist for Sourcehut, as compiled by the Community Workgroup for Libre Forge Software and Ethical Repository Hosts. The text of each criteria in the checklist table is a hyper-link to the relevant section of the ERC. Please send any questions or comments to the repo-criteria-discuss mailing list.
Evaluations:
