Save WiFi/RFC

The following are the different call for comments highlighted by the Federal Registrar's summarization of the NPRM. It might be good to quote the actual NPRM.

• "Finally, the Commission sought comment on how to codify any filing or notification requirements that may be necessitated by the adoption of these proposals." [1]
• "It invited commenters to discuss the costs and benefits of the rule changes proposed in the NPRM, and provide relevant supporting data, along with additional suggestions for enhancing the benefits or reducing the costs associated with the proposals." [2]
• "It tentatively concluded that a single process would simplify the equipment authorization requirements and reduce confusion as to which process may apply to any given device, while continuing to adequately ensure compliance with the rules, and sought comment on the proposed rule revisions." [3]
• " The NPRM sought comment on use of the specific term “Supplier's Declaration of Conformity” or “SDoC” for this new process." [4]
• "It proposed to otherwise retain the other DoC rules (i.e. those within §§ 2.1071 through 2.1077) and to apply them to the new approval procedure, and sought comment on proposed revisions to § 2.1077 that would require all equipment to include a compliance statement with the product literature that identifies for consumers who is responsible for the device's compliance with the Commission's technical regulations. " [5]
• "Additionally, the Commission proposed to permit certification of modular transmitters that consist of a single chip which has been tested to demonstrate compliance in a typical installation provided that the grantee includes detailed instructions for integration into other RF devices (i.e. host devices) to ensure that the ultimate configuration is consistent with the significant parameters for which it was tested. The Commission sought comment on all of these proposals." [6]
• "The Commission sought comment on whether this regulatory regime would enable the development of this kind of product while ensuring compliance with the rules—including those related to interference, RF exposure, and hearing aid compatibility." [7]
• "The proposals would modify the SDR-related requirements in part 2 of its rules based in part on the current Commission practices regarding software configuration control." ... "This information would be included as part of the operational description information required in the application for certification. The Commission sought comment on these proposals." [8]