LibrePlanet: Conference/2014/Conference brainstorm
(→Noam Chomsky) |
m (Noam Chomsky -- typo corrected) |
||
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
* http://www.chomsky.info/ | * http://www.chomsky.info/ | ||
* Critique of US foreign policy, linguist, [http://mit.edu MIT] Professor Emeritus, etc. | * Critique of US foreign policy, linguist, [http://mit.edu MIT] Professor Emeritus, etc. | ||
− | * Opinion concerning Intellectual | + | * Opinion concerning "Intellectual Property", quoted from: http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/noam-chomsky-on-intellectual-property/2011/12/25 ''I just don’t think it has much to do with innovation or independence. It has to do with protecting major concentrations of power, which mostly got their power as a public gift, and making sure that they can maintain and expand their power. And these are highly protectionist devices and I don’t think… You really have to ram them down people’s throats. They don’t make any economic sense or any other sense.'' |
Caveats: | Caveats: |
Revision as of 23:27, 18 December 2013
If you would like to share a quick idea for a workshop, topic, or a speaker you’d like to see at LibrePlanet, please add your thoughts below. You'll have to use the buttons in at the upper right to sign in to this wiki or make an account.
Contents
Workshop ideas
Topic ideas
- GNU Hurd! Perhaps one of the lead developers can speak about the current status and how the community can contribute to the project.
- A session or discussion involving the Electronic Frontier Foundation and/or Fight for the Future (which seems Boston based).
- Free access to information and privacy concerns as it relates to online public libraries such as the Digital Public Library (dp.la), Open Library (https://openlibrary.org/) and the Internet Archive (https://archive.org). Recently, the Open Library and Internet Archive moved to support https (https://blog.archive.org/2013/10/25/reader-privacy-at-the-internet-archive/). It would be great if the DPLA could commit to doing likewise (if they haven't already).
- Relationship between FLOSS and the Open Hardware/Maker Space communities, perhaps in collaboration with Artisan's Asylum of Somerville?
- Relationship between FLOSS and voting machines that cannot be easily hacked, perhaps in collaboration with osdv.org?
- Relationship between FLOSS and charitable efforts, perhaps in collaboration with the Developers for Good meetup out of New York?
- Relationship between FLOSS and local monopoly pricing of broadband internet connections, and government violation of the Bill of Rights, perhaps in collaboration with occupyhere.org and with http://www.whoismcafee.com/future-tense-d-central/
- Free Software and Politics: The different uses and campaigns that political activists can run and conduct
- Automated aquaponics systems: scalable, sustainable food production, using open hardware/software for remote monitoring and automation. Free software, free society, free food!
- As a developer, I would like to publish/donate software for noncommercial purposes, but require paid licensing from the big commercial corporations. I believe many others would want the same. But I have not seen any copyleft discussions or documents that address that type of arrangement.
- Hardware that supports free software and free/open formats (What is available currently, and ways to promote more libre-friendly hardware)
- What can be done to compete against the rise of Raspberry Pi, in particular kits like Kano (http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/alexklein/kano-a-computer-anyone-can-make) which are tremendously attractive to hobbyists and students.
- The Improv was just announced as new Open Hardware: https://makeplaylive.com/#/open-hardware/improv
- Best practices/suggestions for migrating from proprietary ecosystems to free ecosystems (especially for newbies and non-programmers)
- How to run a profitable free-software company (as a newcomer to free software and an end-user/non-programmer, I want to trust that whatever software I use will be supported for years to come (i.e. will be updated regularly), which requires a profitable business model)
- Cooperatives
- FLOSS medical devices
- Safe hacking
Speaker ideas
For each speaker, please note what they work on and what they promote.
For caveats, please try to be precise if they differ from FSF's philosophy. The goal is not to build a list of "sins" (ex: I heard X say "open source" in 2011), but to avoid surprises. For example, some people who support free software promote SaaSS or make a lot of unnecessary compromises.
A person doesn't have to share 100% of FSF's ideals to be a speaker, but it would be best to avoid giving an audience to someone who would encourage people to value convenience over taking a firm stance for freedom.
A link to their project is useful, but it's more important to make our own assessment of their work and standpoints.
Alison Chaiken
Work / ideals:
- ...?
Caveats:
- ...?
Eben Moglen
Work / ideals:
- FSF legal counsel, SFLC free software law firm
Caveats:
- None. His positions on free software are thoroughly documented and don't pose any real problem.
Chris Montgomery
Work / ideals:
- audio video formats (Ogg vorbis, theora, opus...)
- some campaigning against software patents
Caveats:
- Supported Mozilla's November 2013 decision to use CISCO's binary video codec, saying it helps free software most in the long run. (Ciaran comments: he seems to genuinely want to help free software, and this one compromise has to be seen amidst years of work. I noted this issue because I hope all proposals are examined thoroughly but I don't see any problem with having Chris as a speaker.)
- ...?
Jay Sulzberger
Work / ideals:
- ...?
Caveats:
- ...?
John McAfee
Work / ideals:
- ...?
Caveats:
- ...?
Bruce Schneier
Work / ideals:
- Security Technologist, writer, and board member of the EFF
- Outspoken critic of massive surveillance and the need for the engineering community to help fix it:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/05/government-betrayed-internet-nsa-spying
Caveats:
- Doesn't agree that all software users deserve the four freedoms.
- Uses Windows
- Promotes non-free software
- ...?
Jessamyn West
Work / ideals:
- Library Technologist http://www.librarian.net/
- Volunteers with the Open Library
- Online Privacy
- Supports Fair Use
- Education to reduce the Digital Divide
- Co-authored an edition Library Reports concerning OSS: http://maisonbisson.com/oss4lib/ West's contribution seems to be Chapter 10. Her politics are generally aligned with free software: "I believe that humans have a responsibility to look after each other and take care of one another so that everyone's strengths and creativity are utilized and maximized. I also think everyone should be actively working towards this.." http://www.jessamyn.com/me/faq.html#politics I think she offers an opportunity for dialogue with someone on the front lines of reaching out to the community through libraries and education.
Caveats:
- ...?
Aaron Seigo
Work / ideals:
-
http://makeplaylive.com/
- As of May, 2012 is co-owned by Mr. Seigo: http://dot.kde.org/comment/117411#comment-117411
- Improv, open hardware: http://makeplaylive.com/#/open-hardware/improv/discover
- Bodega, a "open digital market": http://aseigo.blogspot.ch/2013/10/freedom-and-content-distribution.html
- Active KDE contributor
- Following Mr. Seigo's blog, it is clear he is a strong "free software" supporter, he states his occupation is to "Create technology that embodies and spreads freedom": http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2013/11/on-introducing-new-ideas-to-free.html
- http://makeplaylive.com/#/who-we-are/our-philosophy , and yes I believe this is his personal philosophy as well.
Caveats:
- ...?
Noam Chomsky
Work / ideals:
- http://www.chomsky.info/
- Critique of US foreign policy, linguist, MIT Professor Emeritus, etc.
- Opinion concerning "Intellectual Property", quoted from: http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/noam-chomsky-on-intellectual-property/2011/12/25 I just don’t think it has much to do with innovation or independence. It has to do with protecting major concentrations of power, which mostly got their power as a public gift, and making sure that they can maintain and expand their power. And these are highly protectionist devices and I don’t think… You really have to ram them down people’s throats. They don’t make any economic sense or any other sense.
Caveats:
- I'm not sure if he is acquainted with the ideals of the free software community. But if he gives a talk regarding recent Snowden's revelations about the N.S.A, it'd be very interesting.
- ...?
Other suggestions
This page was a featured resource in November 2013.