Group: Software/FSDG distributions/Filesystems
From LibrePlanet
(→Filesystems: Complete PureOS comments) |
(→Filesystems: Add NTFS on PureOS) |
||
Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
| <!-- Trisquel 10 (nabia) --> | | <!-- Trisquel 10 (nabia) --> | ||
| <!-- Ututo S --> | | <!-- Ututo S --> | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! ntfs | ||
+ | | <!-- Dragora --> | ||
+ | | <!-- Dynebolics --> | ||
+ | | <!-- Guix --> | ||
+ | | <!-- Hyperbola --> | ||
+ | | <!-- LibreCMC --> | ||
+ | | <!-- Parabola --> | ||
+ | | <!-- ProteanOS --> | ||
+ | | <!-- PureOS 10 (byzantium) --> | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable sortable" border="1" | ||
+ | |- bgcolor="#6699ff" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Packages | ||
+ | | {{yes|Yes: ntfs-3g}} | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Graphical installer | ||
+ | | {{yes}} | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Rootfs | ||
+ | | {{No|Broken}}<ref>The installation succeeds, but then sudo and policykit are broken due to wrong permissions. So users can't install any software. It's also a very bad idea to use NTFS since there is at the time of writing no way to safely repair corrupted NTFS filesystems with free software: The only tools we have are in ntfs-3g and they are way too experimental and dangerous so they are probably not shipped by any distribution.</ref> | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | | <!-- Replicant 6.0 --> | ||
+ | | <!-- Trisquel 10 (nabia) --> | ||
+ | | <!-- Ututo S --> | ||
|} | |} | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references /> | <references /> |
Revision as of 17:05, 3 March 2023
Introduction
This article is about filesystems support and might be extended to take into account block device technologies too like LVM,RAID, etc.
Filesystems
Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dragora | Dynebolics | Guix | Hyperbola | LibreCMC | Parabola | ProteanOS | PureOS 10 (byzantium) | Replicant 6.0 | Trisquel 10 (nabia) | Ututo S | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
btrfs |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ext4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
f2fs |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fat |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hfs | No[3] | No[4] | No[5] | No[6] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hfs+ | No[7] | No[8] | No[9] | No[10] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ntfs |
|
References
- ↑ 1.01.11.21.3 This tells if that filesystem can be used in a system.scm system definition.
- ↑ 2.02.12.22.32.42.52.6 Since users simply run commands manually during the manual installation, they can easily use the (packaged) tools to create new filesystems and add them to /etc/fstab for automatic mounting.
- ↑ There is no hfsutils package.
- ↑ There is no hfsutils package.
- ↑ There is no hfsutils package.
- ↑ There is no hfsutils repository in the manifest.
- ↑ There is no hfsprogs package.
- ↑ There is no hfsprogs package.
- ↑ There is no hfsprogs package.
- ↑ There is no hfsprogs repository in the manifest.
- ↑ The installation succeeds, but then sudo and policykit are broken due to wrong permissions. So users can't install any software. It's also a very bad idea to use NTFS since there is at the time of writing no way to safely repair corrupted NTFS filesystems with free software: The only tools we have are in ntfs-3g and they are way too experimental and dangerous so they are probably not shipped by any distribution.